Ledger Live Mac Silicon: Setup for M1, M2 and M3 Users With the Native arm64 Build
Research Notice: Release-specific figures, supported chip generations, minimum system versions and published digests change between builds, so confirm each of them on the vendor’s official source before acting on anything below.
Ledger Live Apple Silicon Mac Setup Guide – pull the arm64 package from the official download page, compare its published digest, check the code signature, and never let recovery words touch the keyboard. Everything below assumes a charged device, a spare cable, a terminal window, and enough free storage for the application bundle and its local account cache.
How the desktop companion runs on arm64 machines
Client software for this device arrives as a desktop application that reads account data over a cable and asks the hardware to sign each transaction on its own display. On arm64 hardware that same application either executes as code compiled for that instruction set or as x86_64 code handed to the translation layer at launch, and which one applies is stated on the release entry.
Two instruction sets and one translation layer
arm64 and x86_64 are separate instruction sets, and a program compiled for one does not execute directly on the other without a converter. The translation layer rewrites instructions block by block while the code runs and caches the result, so the second launch is quicker than the first while memory use stays above a compiled-for-arm64 equivalent. One practical check: open the activity viewer and read the Kind column, which reports whether a process is running translated or as a native binary.
How a cable session produces a signature
A wired session follows a request-and-answer pattern rather than mounting the device as a drive. The companion assembles an unsigned transaction from public chain data, sends it down the link, and the device renders the amount and the destination address on its own panel; the physical buttons approve, and the signature travels back for broadcast. Private keys stay inside the secure element, so compromised software on the computer can propose a payment but cannot produce a valid signature without that on-device confirmation.
Checks the operating system performs before the window opens
A downloaded bundle carries a quarantine attribute, and the system evaluates its code signature and notarization ticket before the process may run. A failed assessment blocks the launch, and the reason can be read in the terminal with the signature-assessment tool or in the privacy pane of system settings. These checks confirm who signed the bundle and that the file was not altered afterwards; they say nothing about whether the code contains bugs or whether you hold the newest release.
Which holders get the most from the desktop build
Anyone running several accounts across different chains on one screen gets the most from the desktop build, since balances, staking positions and history sit in a single window beside the device prompt. It suits machines you log into yourself; on equipment managed by someone else, a paired handset or a read-only explorer view reaches the same public data with less exposure.
Holders tracking more than one account
Portfolio views spanning several chains are the reason most people open the desktop client instead of the handset build. The application keeps one encrypted local database of public account data, so adding a second account means importing an extended public key rather than pasting a fresh address list. Nothing in that database can move funds on its own, which is why it can be synced, exported for tax software, or copied to another machine while the device stays in a drawer.
Operators of shared or managed computers
Where an administrator controls the machine, the practical question is not speed but who can read the local cache and install updates. An account without administrator rights may refuse the first launch of a freshly downloaded bundle, and a managed profile can block the process outright. In that setting, run the companion from a personal volume, keep device firmware current, and treat the local database as readable by whoever holds the disk.
Cases where a handset or a browser tab is enough
For a quick balance check, a paired handset build or a public explorer removes any need to sit at a desk. Reading chain data requires no signing, so an explorer shows the same balances without installing anything at all. The desktop client earns its place when a transaction must be assembled, reviewed on a large display, and confirmed on the device; for everything before that point, lighter tools do the job.
How does the arm64 package compare with the translated alternative?
A build compiled for arm64 starts faster, holds less memory and triggers fewer fan events than x86_64 code passed through the translation layer, while the translated package remains fully usable and is sometimes the only option a given release offers. Which architecture a download contains is stated on the vendor’s page for that release, not on mirrors.
Five routes reach the same account data on a 64-bit arm machine, and they differ in execution model, fit and the limit each one carries. The table weighs them on those three criteria only; fees, chain coverage and release cadence are excluded because all three move between versions.
| Route | Execution model | Fits best | Main limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Package compiled for arm64 | Runs directly on the chip’s own instruction set | Machines on M-family processors | Availability per release is published on the official source |
| x86_64 package under the translation layer | Instructions converted at run time, then cached | Releases that ship no arm64 build | Higher memory use and a slower first launch |
| Handset companion build | Runs on the phone and pairs with the device | Quick balance and history checks | No large-screen review before a signature |
| Independent desktop managers | Separate code base kept by outside contributors | Unusual chains and scripted workflows | Cannot carry the vendor’s signing identity |
| Terminal-driven interface | Command line, no graphical shell | Headless servers and batch work | Every prompt appears on the device, not the screen |
Reach for the compiled build when the vendor publishes one for the current release, and keep the translated package only as a fallback, expecting the extra memory to bite on an 8 GB machine with browser tabs open. The handset build covers reading and small transfers, independent managers cover chains the official client skips, and the terminal route covers automation. The exception in every row is the managed profile: an administrator can block any of these routes regardless of architecture.
Memory and first-launch time under translation
Translation costs appear before the device is even connected. The first launch rebuilds a cache of converted code, which can take noticeably longer than later runs, and the resident memory footprint stays above that of a compiled build of the same version. On a machine with 8 GB and several heavy applications open, that gap is the one users feel; at 16 GB and above it rarely surfaces. Checking the process kind in the activity viewer settles which case you are in.
Independent managers and what they cannot carry
Third-party clients read the same public chain data and can drive the device through the published protocol, but they ship under their own developer identity and their own update channel. A signature check on such a bundle proves who built it, not that the vendor endorses it, and no official support path covers a failed transaction. They are reasonable for chains the official client ignores, provided the device panel remains the only place a final decision is made.
Limits and mistakes that cost the most time
The two failures that eat an evening are a digest compared against a stale value on a mirror page, and a companion older than the firmware on the device. Both produce confusing symptoms – a launch that dies without explanation, or a session that opens and then refuses to hand over account data. Reinstalling repeatedly cures neither.
Stale digest values on mirror pages
Mirrors and forum posts repeat checksums from earlier releases, so a perfectly good download fails against a perfectly good-looking value. Compute the digest of the file you actually hold, compare it with the string printed on the vendor’s page for that exact release, and re-download rather than re-hash when the two disagree. A second quiet failure mode: copying a digest out of a chat message, where one transposed character turns a valid string into a mismatch.
Version drift between companion and device
A companion that predates the firmware on the device can pair and then stall, because the two sides disagree about the message format used for account discovery. Updating the companion usually resolves it, and device firmware is updated from inside the companion while the device is connected and unlocked. When release notes list a minimum firmware version, treat that line as a requirement rather than a suggestion.
Skipping the on-device address check
The strongest control in the whole arrangement is reading the destination address on the device panel and matching it against the window. Malware on the computer can substitute an address in the interface, and only the device display exposes that swap; the confirmation prompt exists for precisely this case. Rebuilding a lost transaction costs minutes, while a broadcast to a wrong address cannot be reversed.
How do you verify a package and its first connection?
Verification means proving that the file you hold came from the vendor unaltered and that the session you open talks to the device you own, and it takes a terminal window, the installer, the published digest for that release, and the device itself. Run the five checks below in order before entering any account data.
Step 1: Confirm the file you downloaded
Run the file-inspection command on the downloaded bundle and read the architecture line it prints. A bundle compiled for the other instruction set still installs and still runs, so the mismatch stays hidden until translated execution shows up as memory pressure.
Step 2: Compute the local digest
Generate a SHA-256 digest of the installer with the system hashing tool and keep the output on screen. Hashing the file you actually hold is the only way to compare it against a published value, because a digest copied from anywhere else describes a different file.
Step 3: Match the digest against the official source
Compare the digest character by character with the value printed for that exact release on the vendor’s own page, not on a mirror or a chat thread. Mirrors lag behind new releases, and a mismatch caused by an outdated page sends you chasing a download that was never broken.
Step 4: Inspect the code signature and notarization status
Run the signature-verification command against the installed bundle, read the authority chain it reports, and check the notarization assessment. These two results confirm that the bundle was signed under the vendor’s developer identity and that the system’s review service has seen it, which is the closest thing to local proof of origin available.
Step 5: Match the address on the device panel
Connect the device, open the receive screen in the companion, and compare the address shown on the panel with the one displayed in the window. Any substitution introduced by software on the computer becomes visible here, and this is the last moment before funds move.
Which parts still change between releases?
Supported chip generations, minimum system versions, the architecture of the published package and the wording of the verification steps all move as the companion and the desktop operating system are updated. Treat nothing above as fixed for a release you have not checked; the vendor’s notes for that build are the current statement of each detail.
Chip generations and minimum system versions
Each release names the processor generations and the oldest supported system version it was built against, and those two lines are the fastest way to predict trouble. A build requiring a newer system version simply refuses to launch, while one that drops support for an older processor generation disappears from the compatible list with no announcement beyond the notes. Read both lines before downloading rather than after a failed launch.
Where package architecture is announced
Whether a release ships a compiled-for-arm64 bundle, a translated-compatible one, or a universal file holding both slices is stated on the download entry for that version, and it can differ between the desktop and the handset builds. Forum posts and video walkthroughs rarely say which architecture they demonstrated, which is why instructions copied from them sometimes describe a slower experience than a reader expects. Use the inspection command on the file you actually hold.
Where release notes contradict forum advice
Advice to switch off system protections or to run the companion from a second administrator account circulates widely and works against the design of the platform. The protected launch path is the mechanism binding running code to the vendor’s signing identity, so disabling it removes a check that no later step replaces. When a thread and the release notes disagree, the notes describe the version you are installing and the thread describes somebody else’s.
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "Ledger Live Apple Silicon Mac Setup Guide: native arm64 install, verification checks and known limits",
"description": "Installing the companion client on an arm64 desktop machine means checking the package architecture, the published digest and the code signature before any account data is entered. This walkthrough covers who the desktop build suits, how it differs from the translated package, and which limits persist across releases."
}
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "HowTo",
"name": "How do you verify a package and its first connection?",
"step": [
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"text": "Run the file-inspection command on the downloaded bundle and read the architecture line it prints."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"text": "Generate a SHA-256 digest of the installer with the system hashing tool and keep the output on screen."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"text": "Compare the digest character by character with the value printed for that exact release on the vendor's own page, not on a mirror or a chat thread."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"text": "Run the signature-verification command against the installed bundle, read the authority chain it reports, and check the notarization assessment."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"text": "Connect the device, open the receive screen in the companion, and compare the address shown on the panel with the one displayed in the window."
}
]
}
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"headline": "Check macOS Version and Apple Silicon Chip Compatibility Before Installing Ledger Live: OS Build, Processor Family and Package Slice Verification",
"description": "Check macOS Version and Apple Silicon Chip Compatibility Before Installing Ledger Live before the first launch: read the system version, the build identifier and the processor family, then match all three against the manufacturer's published range. Native, universal, converted and legacy packages behave differently, and mismatches usually surface as a launch that ends silently or a device that never connects."
}
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "HowTo",
"name": "How Do You Verify the System Version and Chip Family Before Installing?",
"step": [
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 1,
"text": "Open System Settings, choose General, then About, and copy the version number and the build identifier into a note."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 2,
"text": "Run uname -m in Terminal and record whether the answer is arm64 or x86_64."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 3,
"text": "Run lipo -archs on the main executable inside the downloaded bundle and list the code families it reports."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 4,
"text": "Open the requirements table on the manufacturer's official pages and match your version, build and code family against it line by line."
},
{
"@type": "HowToStep",
"position": 5,
"text": "Read the same three values again after every major system release and before you open the application a second time."
}
]
}
Check macOS Version and Apple Silicon Chip Compatibility Before Installing Ledger Live by reading the system version and the processor family from the machine itself, then matching both readings against the range the manufacturer publishes. Two values decide the outcome, and neither can be inferred from the other.
What the Version and Processor Check Actually Verifies
The check reads two independent facts and compares them with a published list. The first is the operating system version and build identifier, which fixes the system frameworks the application may call. The second is the processor family, which decides whether the package runs its own machine instructions or hands them to a conversion layer.
Reading the system version and build identifier
Open System Settings, choose General, then About, and read the number beside the system name. The marketing version and the build identifier move at different speeds: a major upgrade shifts the first, while a security patch usually shifts only the second. Two machines showing the same marketing version can therefore run different framework revisions, and a program that calls a newer one either refuses to open or fails during its first connection to a hardware wallet.
Reading the processor family from the kernel
Terminal answers this in one command: uname -m prints arm64 on machines built around the in-house ARM design and x86_64 on older Intel-based units. The value describes the running kernel, not the package, so it shows which code slice the loader will prefer when several are present. A build carrying only x86_64 instructions still opens on the newer chips, but only after the conversion layer, the system translator that rewrites x86_64 code for ARM processors, converts it in memory. That raises peak memory use and lengthens the first launch.
Verifying which slices a package really contains
A downloaded file can claim to support both families and still hold one slice after a partial download or a repackaged mirror copy. Run lipo -archs on the main executable inside the bundle, or open the Finder information window and read the Kind field, which names the code family the bundle carries. Confirming the slices before the first launch separates a genuine compatibility problem from a damaged archive, and it is the only reading that describes the file rather than the machine.
Who Needs This Check, and When Does It Apply?
Anyone preparing a first installation on a machine made after 2020, and anyone whose existing copy stopped opening hardware devices after a system upgrade. It applies before the first run, after every major version jump, and whenever a package update raises the minimum system version without announcing it.
Machines that moved to the in-house chip design
Desktops and laptops sold from late 2020 onward use the ARM-based processors, while earlier units use Intel processors. Repackaged mirrors and older installers often carry a single-family build written for the previous generation, and those bundles need the conversion layer. Checking the family first explains why an installer that worked on an older unit opens slowly, asks for extra memory, or fails at the moment it tries to reach the connected device.
Virtual machines and remote desktop sessions
A hosted desktop or a remote session can report the processor family of the host rather than the family of the device in front of you, and the answer changes which build is appropriate. Inside a virtualised system, run the same kernel query and read the reported value, because the guest may be configured as x86_64 even on ARM hardware. Downloads chosen on the strength of the physical machine alone frequently mismatch what the running session will accept.
Installations that survive a version upgrade
An application that keeps working after a system upgrade is not proof that the pairing still sits inside the supported range. Major releases drop older frameworks, so a build that ran on version 12 may open on version 14 yet lose access to the device driver path or to the background service it needs. Re-read both values after the upgrade and compare them with the current published list rather than with the list you used a year earlier.
Native, Converted and Legacy Packages Compared
Four routes reach the same desktop application: a native arm64 package, a universal bundle carrying both code families, an x86_64 package executed through the conversion layer, and a legacy release kept for older system versions. They differ in start-up cost, update cadence and the reliability of the device connection.
The comparison sets the four routes side by side on the criteria that decide the outcome: what each one requires from the machine, how the loader treats it at runtime, and which reading confirms it before anything is launched. Version ranges themselves are not listed here, because they are published by the manufacturer and revised with each release.
| Route | What it requires | Runtime behaviour | How to confirm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Native arm64 package | Newer chips inside the manufacturer’s published version range | Runs directly, no conversion step at launch | lipo -archs reports arm64 |
| Universal package | Either processor family inside the published range | The loader picks the matching slice automatically | lipo -archs reports both families |
| x86_64-only package | Intel hardware, or newer chips with the conversion layer present | Instructions converted at runtime, higher memory use | Kind column in Activity Monitor reads Intel |
| Legacy release for older systems | System versions below the current published minimum | No feature updates, slower support for recent firmware | Release history on the manufacturer’s official pages |
A universal bundle fits most people, because the loader chooses the matching slice and leaves no decision to the user. A native package fits a machine kept on one current version where nothing else depends on the older family. The converted route fits only while the conversion layer is present and the extra memory cost is acceptable; it stops fitting during long sessions with a device attached. The legacy branch fits machines that cannot move forward and are used offline, and it stops fitting once the connected device receives firmware newer than that branch supports.
Why the conversion layer raises memory use and start-up time
Code written for one instruction set has to be rewritten into another before the processor can act on it, and that rewriting happens while the program starts and whenever execution reaches a section not yet converted. The translated copy is held in memory alongside the original, so the first seconds of a session carry the cost of building it. Repeated launches smooth this out because the system caches the result, but a single launch after a large update pays the price again. Peak memory therefore stays above what a native build of the same release needs.
Where the legacy branch stops being a safe option
A release kept for older system versions no longer receives feature work, and its support for device firmware stops advancing at the point the branch is frozen. That matters because the connected device updates independently of the computer: a firmware revision published after the freeze may require a newer communication library than the old branch contains. The warning signs are a device recognised but reporting an unexpected state, or a connection that drops mid-transaction. When either appears, the branch is no longer viable for that device.
What Goes Wrong When the Package and the Chip Family Disagree?
Three failures dominate: the application closes before a window appears, it opens but never sees the connected device, and it runs until a firmware update changes the device state. Each leaves a different signature in the logs, and each is resolved by a different route rather than by reinstalling repeatedly.
A launch that ends before any window appears
A missing code slice and a system version below the published minimum produce the same visible result, which is why both values have to be read before any conclusion is drawn. The system log records the reason in the seconds around the attempt: a reference to a missing architecture means the bundle lacks the slice for the running kernel, while a reference to a symbol or framework names a version problem. Filtering the log by the process name separates the two cases in a few lines of output.
A device that is seen but never recognised
Conversion layers handle ordinary library calls well and behave less predictably when a program talks straight to a connected device through a background service. The symptom is a device that appears in the interface but sits at an unnamed state, or a session that drops in the middle of an operation. Repeating the connection rarely helps. The useful test is to try the same device on a machine running the native slice; if it is recognised there, the pairing rather than the hardware is the problem.
Updates that raise the minimum without notice
Desktop releases occasionally move their minimum system version upward, and the change appears in the release notes rather than in a dialog inside the application. An installation can therefore run for months and then refuse to start after an ordinary package update on an older machine. Reading the release notes before allowing an update, and keeping one older installer that matches the machine, avoids a position where neither the new release nor the old one can be obtained quickly.
How Do You Verify the System Version and Chip Family Before Installing?
Read the version and build identifier from the About panel, read the processor family from the kernel, inspect the package for its code slices, then compare all three readings with the requirements list the manufacturer publishes. Have the installer already downloaded and two minutes of access to a Terminal window.
Step 1: Read the version and build identifier
Open System Settings, choose General, then About, and copy the version number and the build identifier into a note. The build identifier separates machines that share a marketing version but run different framework revisions, which is the pair a requirements list usually refers to.
Step 2: Identify the processor family
Run uname -m in Terminal and record whether the answer is arm64 or x86_64. That single value tells you whether a single-family package runs directly or needs the conversion layer, and it decides the rest of the check.
Step 3: Inspect the package slices
Run lipo -archs on the main executable inside the downloaded bundle and list the code families it reports. A bundle carrying one family behaves differently from a universal one, and knowing which you hold prevents you from blaming the system version for a packaging difference.
Step 4: Compare every reading with the published list
Open the requirements table on the manufacturer’s official pages and match your version, build and code family against it line by line. Anything absent from that table is unsupported, whatever a forum post or a mirror page states.
Step 5: Repeat the check after each major upgrade
Read the same three values again after every major system release and before you open the application a second time. Upgrades replace frameworks and can change the preferred code slice, so a pairing that held last year is not guaranteed to hold this year.
What Is Unsettled, and What People Commonly Get Wrong
The supported range is not fixed. Each application release can raise the minimum system version, and the recommended version usually sits one or two steps above the minimum. Hardware coverage, by contrast, has stayed steady since the in-house processors arrived, because both code families remain usable through the conversion layer.
The minimum moves with every release cycle
Requirements are revised release by release rather than once a year, so a figure copied from an article written several versions ago can be wrong today. The list on the manufacturer’s own pages is the reading that stays correct, and it names both a minimum and a recommended version. A machine sitting between the two runs the application with a reduced margin: it works, but the next ordinary update is likelier to push it below the floor.
Confusing the marketing version with the build identifier
Support pages quote a version number because that is what most people can find, but the diagnostics that matter, including framework availability, follow the build identifier. Two machines on the same named version can differ by several builds, and a problem reported as a version mismatch is often a build-level difference. When you contact support, quoting both values removes a round of questions and gives the answer something concrete to be checked against.
The mistaken belief that a converted package always fails
A single-family package written for the older code family usually runs correctly on the newer chips, and the conversion layer stays invisible for most operations. Reported failures cluster around device communication and the first seconds after a large update, which is a narrow band rather than the whole experience. Treating the converted route as broken pushes people toward unofficial builds, which carry a larger risk than the conversion layer ever did.
Q&A:
Do I really need the Apple Silicon build, or can I keep using the Intel version with Rosetta?
You can keep using the Intel build with Rosetta, but the native Apple Silicon build is better for M-series Macs. It runs without translation, so it starts faster and uses less power. Download the macOS (Apple silicon) installer from Ledger’s official site. If you already have the Intel version, remove it, then install the ARM build. Your Ledger Live accounts and settings should remain in your user data, but you can export a backup if you want. Check Activity Monitor: under Kind, the process should say Apple, not Intel. If Rosetta asks to install, you downloaded the wrong package.
My Nano X pairs over Bluetooth on my iPhone, but Ledger Live on my M2 Mac won’t find it. What should I try?
Check that the Mac’s Bluetooth is on and that Ledger Live has Bluetooth permission in System Settings > Privacy & Security > Bluetooth. On the Nano X, turn Bluetooth on in its settings. In Ledger Live, go to My Ledger and choose Add device. If the device does not appear, forget the Nano X in macOS Bluetooth settings, restart both the Mac and the Nano X, then pair again through Ledger Live. Move away from other Bluetooth devices, and plug the Nano X into the Mac with a USB-C cable if pairing keeps failing. Bluetooth works for Nano X and Ledger Stax, but USB is more reliable for firmware updates.
Ledger Live sees my Nano S but says it’s “not recognized” when I try to add accounts. Could macOS be blocking the USB connection?
Yes, macOS can block or fail to pass through USB devices for a few reasons. Use the cable that came with the Ledger, or a known data cable. Some USB-C cables only charge. Connect the Ledger directly to the Mac, not through a hub, monitor, or dock. Enter your PIN on the device, open Ledger Live, then connect the cable. In System Settings > Privacy & Security, check “Allow accessories to connect” and set it to “Ask for new accessories” or “Always” depending on your macOS version. If a prompt appears when you plug in the Ledger, choose Allow. Quit other wallet apps, close browser tabs that use WebUSB, and restart Ledger Live. If it still fails, try another USB-C port on the Mac.
Is Ledger Live available in the Mac App Store for M1 Macs, or do I have to download it from the Ledger website?
Ledger Live for macOS is not distributed through the Mac App Store. Get it from ledger.com only. The official download page offers a macOS (Apple silicon) file and a macOS (Intel) file. Pick the Apple silicon one for M1, M2, M3, or M4 Macs. After download, open the .dmg, drag Ledger Live to Applications, and launch it. macOS will verify the app. If you see a warning, check that the file came from ledger.com and compare the version number on the download page. Avoid third-party mirrors, cracked builds, or apps with similar names. Those can steal your recovery phrase.
Does Ledger Live on an Apple Silicon Mac store my private keys on the SSD?
No. Your private keys stay inside the Ledger hardware wallet. Ledger Live is a companion app: it builds transactions, shows balances, and sends instructions to the device. The device signs only after you confirm on its screen. The Mac never receives the keys. Still, treat the Mac as a possible weak point. Keep macOS updated, use a strong login password, turn on FileVault, and download Ledger Live only from ledger.com. Ledger Live will never ask for your 24-word recovery phrase. If any app, website, or support person asks for it, stop and treat it as a scam.
Do I need Rosetta 2 to run Ledger Live on an M1 or M2 Mac?
Not for current releases. Ledger Live now has Apple Silicon support, so you can run it without Rosetta on an M1, M2, M3, or newer Mac. Download the macOS installer from ledger.com, open the .dmg, and move Ledger Live to Applications. If macOS asks for Rosetta, update Ledger Live first. If you must use an older release, Rosetta can run it, but the newer build is the better choice.
My Ledger Nano X is not detected by Ledger Live on my M3 MacBook Air. What should I try?
This usually comes from cable, port, or macOS accessory permission, not from Ledger Live itself. Connect the Nano X directly to a USB-C port on the Mac with the cable that came in the box. Avoid hubs, docks, and charge-only cables. Enter your PIN on the device and leave it on the dashboard. On Apple Silicon Macs, macOS may show an “Allow accessory to connect” prompt; click Allow. If you do not see it, open System Settings > Privacy & Security > Security, then set “Allow accessories to connect” to Ask for new accessories or Always. Next, open System Information > USB and confirm the Nano X appears. If it does, quit other wallet apps that may grab the device, then reopen Ledger Live. If it does not, try another cable and port, restart the Mac and the Nano X, and test with a different computer. If another computer also fails, the cable or device may need replacement. Never enter your recovery phrase into Ledger Live or any website while troubleshooting.
How can I be sure the Ledger Live app I installed on my Mac is genuine?
Get it only from ledger.com. Ledger does not distribute Ledger Live through the Mac App Store, so any App Store listing or search ad is not official. After downloading, open the .dmg and drag Ledger Live to Applications. In Finder, you can check the app’s signature with Terminal: codesign -dv –verbose=4 /Applications/Ledger\ Live.app and spctl -a -vv /Applications/Ledger\ Live.app. The signature should show Ledger SAS. When you launch it, the app should connect to your Ledger device and offer to verify its authenticity. Ledger Live will never ask for your 24-word recovery phrase. If any app or site does, close it and report it. Bookmark the official download page and use that bookmark for future updates.
